Developer platform
Free
Ongoing; BYOK scoring after first three submissions
- Included scope
- Challenge practice; inference costs separate
AI coding collaboration practice · Official-source review 2026-10-09
kodwai supplies local coding challenges and scores how a developer directs an AI agent. Submissions include code, commits, tests and an agent transcript, with feedback on direction, outcomes and caught traps.
Relevant to practicing agent supervision on challenge repositories with no sensitive code or transcript content.
Fifteen project challenges listed. Default score weights 50/35/15; rubric-specific challenges 45/45/10. Demo scores explicitly made up, not measured performance. CLI says collection is limited to challenge folder, but actual behavior was not audited. Scores and public profiles are platform-defined signals, not proof of employment readiness. Separate coding-agent and scoring model costs remain. No challenge installed, transcript uploaded or score obtained.
Use a disposable challenge folder, inspect collected files/transcript, and compare feedback with real tests before sharing a profile.
Fifteen project challenges listed. Default score weights 50/35/15; rubric-specific challenges 45/45/10. Demo scores explicitly made up, not measured performance. CLI says collection is limited to challenge folder, but actual behavior was not audited. Scores and public profiles are platform-defined signals, not proof of employment readiness. Separate coding-agent and scoring model costs remain. No challenge installed, transcript uploaded or score obtained.
Official product evidence reviewed on 2026-10-09; product artwork inspected visually. No hands-on vendor application test was performed. Application performance, security claims and plan enforcement were not independently tested.
What it can do
Unknown is different from unavailable. Each fact carries its own evidence.
| Capability | Value | Evidence | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product workflow | kodwai supplies local coding challenges and scores how a developer directs an AI agent. Submissions include code, commits, tests and an agent transcript, with feedback on direction, outcomes and caught traps. | Facts sourced | 2026-10-09 |
| Pricing and restrictions | Fifteen project challenges listed. Default score weights 50/35/15; rubric-specific challenges 45/45/10. Demo scores explicitly made up, not measured performance. CLI says collection is limited to challenge folder, but actual behavior was not audited. Scores and public profiles are platform-defined signals, not proof of employment readiness. Separate coding-agent and scoring model costs remain. No challenge installed, transcript uploaded or score obtained. | Facts sourced | 2026-10-09 |
Understand the total cost
Developer platform
Free
Ongoing; BYOK scoring after first three submissions
ByteAsk is a terminal-based AI coding agent for C and C++ that edits repositories and verifies work with compilers, sanitizers, debuggers, and tests. It integrates LLVM, GCC, gdb, Valgrind, CMake, and related tooling with grounded standards and datasheet excerpts.
Explore toolSidegent teaches AI concepts through interactive lessons, graded agent labs and browser-accessible cloud machines. Its tutor and coding assistant help learners work with actual agent frameworks inside the lessons.
Explore toolMoxie Docs reads selected GitHub repositories to generate source-linked architecture, conventions and onboarding documentation. It proposes documentation pull requests when code changes, supplies agent context over MCP and offers separately reviewed hosted knowledgebase pages.
Explore toolThe practical questions
No. This listing is based on dated official-source evidence and a visual artwork check. Unconfirmed costs and restrictions are identified explicitly.
kodwai supplies local coding challenges and scores how a developer directs an AI agent. Submissions include code, commits, tests and an agent transcript, with feedback on direction, outcomes and caught traps.
Platform free for developers; first three submissions scored on provider key. Later scoring requires your own paid Anthropic API key.. This record lists ongoing free access; check the plan limits before starting.
No paid monthly price is listed; this record treats the product as free to start. See the plan cards for entitlements, billing commitments and seat minimums.
Challenge/submit CLI for Claude Code, Cursor or Codex. Not confirmed: public API or hiring-team numeric pricing.. API access and subscription access may have different terms; consult the linked sources.
Fifteen project challenges listed. Default score weights 50/35/15; rubric-specific challenges 45/45/10. Demo scores explicitly made up, not measured performance. CLI says collection is limited to challenge folder, but actual behavior was not audited. Scores and public profiles are platform-defined signals, not proof of employment readiness. Separate coding-agent and scoring model costs remain. No challenge installed, transcript uploaded or score obtained.
No retained pricing changes yet. A current price alone does not establish a historical trend.
Current official product source read individually; product artwork inspected visually.
Read original source ↗Official product page reviewed for disclosed costs; unverified prices and allowances are identified in the listing.
Read original source ↗Facts apply to the named version and check date. Send a sourced correction if something changed.