Team
$40.00 /mo
Per developer per month, billed monthly
- Reviews
- 40,000 reviewed lines per month listed on pricing page
- Agents
- Five custom review agents
Finding the possibilities
cubic
● Identity checkedCode · Vendor site 2026-10-04
cubic is an AI code review product that analyzes pull requests and entire repositories to surface hard-to-find bugs in complex codebases. It integrates with engineering workflows and advertises top benchmark scores alongside team, pro, and max developer plans.
- Category
- Code
- Free access
- Marketing invites teams to start a free trial on the homepage
- API access
- Not confirmed
Is cubic right for you?
A good fit for
Engineering teams that want automated PR and codebase review with custom agents and analytics in Git-based workflows.
Before you choose
Paid tiers bill per developer per month, starting at $40/month for the Team plan on the public pricing page.
AI code review for complex repos
cubic targets deep bug finding in large codebases, pairing PR automation with configurable review agents and workflow integrations.
What it can do
Features & capabilities
Unknown is different from unavailable. Each fact carries its own evidence.
| Capability | Value | Evidence | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark claims | Homepage states cubic ranks #1 on independent AI code review benchmarks. | Facts sourced | 2026-10-04 |
| Review scope | Product copy covers both pull request review and whole-codebase analysis. | Facts sourced | 2026-10-04 |
| Team pricing | Pricing page lists Team at $40 per developer per month billed monthly. | Facts sourced | 2026-10-04 |
Understand the total cost
cubic pricing & plans
Pro
$99.00 /mo
Per developer per month, billed monthly
- Includes
- Everything in Team plus expanded review allowance
- Integrations
- Jira, Linear, and Asana integrations listed
Max
$200.00 /mo
Per developer per month, billed monthly
- Support
- Premium support and shared Slack with engineering team
- Allowance
- 2.5× Pro review allowance per pricing copy
Alternatives to cubic
View all ↗
DevinDevin is Cognition’s autonomous software engineering agent that runs in the cloud or locally, tests in its own browser, and works toward merge-ready pull requests. Plans span individual coding quotas through team collaboration with Devin Cloud, DeepWiki, and enterprise controls.
Explore tool
CodebaseChatCodebaseChat connects GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket repositories to a natural-language chat interface so developers can query architecture, hunt bugs, and review code without endless grep sessions. It advertises natural-language search, architecture explainers, doc generation, and multi-repo support for engineering teams.
Explore tool
CapyCapy is an AI software engineer that orchestrates parallel cloud coding agents to plan, build, review, and ship changes from Slack, desktop, and web clients. Use cases include PR review, visual QA, issue triage, documentation, migrations, refactors, and scheduled E2E testing.
Explore toolThe practical questions
Frequently asked questions
What is cubic used for?
cubic is an AI code review product that analyzes pull requests and entire repositories to surface hard-to-find bugs in complex codebases. It integrates with engineering workflows and advertises top benchmark scores alongside team, pro, and max developer plans.
Does cubic have a free plan?
Marketing invites teams to start a free trial on the homepage. This record does not confirm an ongoing free plan.
How much does cubic cost?
The listed monthly price is $40.00 USD at monthly billing. See the plan cards for entitlements, billing commitments and seat minimums.
Can I use cubic through an API?
Not confirmed. API access and subscription access may have different terms; consult the linked sources.
What should I check before choosing it?
Paid tiers bill per developer per month, starting at $40/month for the Team plan on the public pricing page.
Price history
No retained pricing changes yet. A current price alone does not establish a historical trend.
How this profile is supported
Identity and profile
Reviewed vendor source
Read original source ↗Facts apply to the named version and check date. Send a sourced correction if something changed.